Scribner software systems
In Scrivener, everything you write is integrated into an easy-to-use project outline. So working with an overview of your manuscript is only ever a click away, and turning Chapter Four into Chapter One is as simple as drag and drop.
Need to refer to research? In Scrivener, your background material is always at hand, and you can open it right next to your work. Write a description based on a photograph. Transcribe an interview. Take notes about a PDF file or web page. Or check for consistency by referencing an earlier chapter alongside the one in progress.
Once you're ready to share your work with the world, compile everything into a single document for printing, self-publishing, or exporting to popular formats such as Word, PDF, Final Draft or plain text. You can even share using different formatting, so that you can write in your favorite font and still satisfy those submission guidelines. I genuinely think this is the biggest software advance for writers since the word processor. Merlin Mann , indie writer, speaker, and broadcaster.
If there was a list of the top five greatest apps of all time in the Mac App Store, it would start with Scrivener and then there would be four other things. As a writer's application, Scrivener is damn near perfect; it means outlines, treatments and then first drafts can be put together in the same application. Antony Johnston , comics writer and novelist. I'd thought it was yet another hobby app at first but this is genuinely for working writers with real deadlines and monster workloads.
Karen Traviss , 1 NYT best-selling author. Scrivener 1. Scrivener 3. For the latest news about our products, including new version announcements, sign up for our spam-free newsletter. Overall, the way I was treated further disenfranchised me as well as learning that they do a rolling authentication on even purchased, stable Scrivener 1. Makes me worried what might happen if ever they stop servicing those servers.
I hope many windows users do the same. Saw someone describe it as windows users being 3rd rate citizens. I totally agree with that. Losing work was definitely a concern, I posted on their forums about it and got back several opinions and finally decided to give it a go. Obviously, other people may have different experiences.
BTW— if you DO find a good alternative, please let us know. Have a look at miro. Not a writing tool like Scrivener, but it will give you a way to digitize your new workflow. I foolishly bought Scrivener for Windows without reading into the fact that I was getting an old and outdated piece of software, years behind the iOS version. While I certainly accept fault for not reading the fine print more closely, I also fault the developers for misleading their customers.
This is the default way that Word is setup. Without this feature, I cannot write. When I try to write in Scrivener for Windows, the task is simply too daunting. Once I realized that my writing had slowed by a massive order of magnitude, I decided to ditch the software and go back to Word.
I have my fingers crossed that 3. Thanks so much for your comment! The absence of margins always irked me. I think you can customize it in the view window, but the default view is just weird.
I also agree that more transparency is needed. And here we are, on June 13, Still no Scrivener either. It combines the best features of Scrivener and Word in a minimalist layout. With page margins! Happy writing! I tried so hard to customize the editor settings but it never wanted to work with me.
Every chapter draft had different spacing too. Thank you all so much for this article and comments! I bought Scrivener for Windows, too, but am having a hard time getting set up on it and using it and my info is too scattered, not progressing.
Keeping my index cards for sanity and using Microsoft Word as at least I know how to move forward that way. Will check out Smart Edit Writer for easier organization for book materials. Either drop it or sync it up already.
Time is too precious, going to cut bait even though I just bought it a few months ago. Lesson learnt. I have some others. A Windows developer approached Literature and Latte several years ago and offered to develop a version for Windows, essentially licensing the product but making it entirely by himself. Even when it first came out, it was behind the version for Apple devices, and though he has progressed it still lags behind.
Very interesting. But I thought they decided to pick up the gauntlet and make a Windows version when so many people wanted one. They own whatever is good or bad about it, and they have an obligation to fulfill the commitment to their customers to release Scrivener 3 for Windows.
Lots of companies outsource some or all of their product development and support, which is fine. But you own the problems of the products you sell, and on which you put your name. As a software developer who writes in his free time, I can say for a fact that the the devs of Scrivener are idiots. You miss one deadline. You miss several? You should look for some classes or maybe another job that is more your speed.
Ya done, son. A bad manager can only bork a project so much. I bought this software in I will not be buying S3 for windows because by the time it comes out S4 for mac will be available and we will have to go through this all over again. No thanks. Campfire Pro is a great organizational tool and works tons better than scrivener when it comes to plot planning and character development. My hope is that they will add a full fledged editor in Blaze when it comes available. This is a refreshingly honest take!
Thousands of paying customers, mind you. I might give one of those programs I try. Hopefully, I can find something with a comparable feature set. I noticed that too. I occasionally browse the forums for updates and the crew really comes out baring their teeth anytime a dissatisfied customer raises a complaint. Not a good look…. Still, I tried to give them the benefit of the doubt, precisely for the reason that Scrivener fans are so die-hard about this outdated software.
I mean, fair play to the iOS users who have a functional program, but their blatant disregard for Windows users tanks their credibility as a company. And yes, the beta aggravates me. And you could always, you know… implement future updates. It preserves the best functionalities of Scrivener in a minimalist, clean interface.
Definitely recommend playing around with it. Hope you find something that works for you! I also had my issues with the Scrivener forum when I voiced my disappointment over the non-release.
Some community members are toxic and plain disrespectful. But I was pleasantly surprised. Scrivener die-hards will jump down your throat if you dare criticize their precious program. That was my worst nightmare with using the beta. I appreciate you taking the time to read the post, reply to other commenters here, and share your experience. What I meant about the program being imperfect is that every initial release of a program will have some bugs. Admittedly, I have no idea.
Again, I defer to the developers who have commented on this post. When I first used the beta in summer , I did receive a warning saying not to use the beta for important projects just in case something went awry. Of course backups are a thing, but still.
They may have created a more stable version of the beta since then, but that was the case when I used it. I use both Windows and Mac, but currently Scrivener projects are not compatible.
I think typing and general experience working on a macbook air will be much better than working on any tablet, Android or iOS. Not to mention the fact that you have to share a laptop. As creators, I believe, we have to invest in our creative tools, as a number 1 priority. Particularly when the developers of said program have been promising this update for nearly 3 years now and have continuously failed to deliver.
They promised us Scrivener 3 for Windows by August 30, That date passed, then they said it would be a matter of weeks. And besides, not everyone can afford to buy a Mac until Scrivener 3 for Windows is released. As I said, I loved using Scrivener and was reluctant to part ways with it.
What a great article and I am right there with you. One of the biggest issues I find with using v. This makes it nearly impossible to use for an extended period of time. As for the storyboard side of things and keeping note cards on all of the background information, I know just how annoying it is to try and keep things in folders in Drive.
The block format they use is really nice when it comes to rearranging things. You can create links between various pages. The best part is that it is accessible from any type of device.
I use it on my computer and they have an android app as well. I would recommend checking it out. Hi Joshua, thanks for taking the time out of your busy day to read and comment.
Funnily enough, I actually started using Notion a couple of months ago for work and completely fell in love. But, jumping on a different computer or on my phone and not being able to pick up where I left off is kind of a deal-breaker. The functionality of Notion is amazing and it does things a lot better than most other software options. Most of my stuff is currently stored in my Drive, but I am thinking about migrating all of it into Notion. I would most likely continue to use Docs for the actual WIP, but I think having everything else in Notion makes a lot of sense.
To me, having everything easily accessible and easily navigable is the biggest benefit of Notion. With Drive, everything is in a separate file and it can be really hard to navigate from one thing to another, especially when I have to figure out what folder I put it in… There is nothing worse than knowing you did a writeup on something and you have to spend 10 minutes trying to find it, or hunt through every option provided in a search.
The other thing is that a lot of the notes could be put into a table and then viewed in different ways.
Whether as a list or in more of a gallery format, which is nice. Absolutely agree that cross-device functionality is a deal-breaker. And yes, Drive can be a bit of a pain to navigate.
I ran into that problem with storing my own research there. In terms of your handwritten worldbuilding materials, could you upload those as photos into Notion? Maybe alongside the typed-up version? I feel you because I have a handwritten scene card setup and a typed version, so keeping them both updated is PITA.
I may have to do some experimenting too…. Let me know how you get on if you do decide to experiment. I may pick your brain when it comes time for my Notion for Writers series, haha.
You gotta love anything that works well and is also free. Yes, you can embed a Google Doc into Notion. It also makes accessing your WIP really easy on your phone. More than likely they would need to remain in their respective locations… notes in Notion and WIP in Drive. Nevertheless, having both certainly makes things easier to use as a whole.
For worldbuilding notes, I knew that I was going to be making changes as things evolved so I decided to just retype them all so that I have a malleable digital version. I do like tables, though I am not much of a pro with them.
I end up keeping things mostly on different pages so that I can modify them as needed. Granted, I should probably spend some more time using tables in general.
Would it be nice to have everything easily accessible and all in one location a sort of cloud-based Scrivener? But having things accessible from anywhere and cloud saved on the regular is the most important thing for me.
I just copy and paste my outline into my WIP and then start writing after that section. I agree. My thoughts exactly. Thanks for taking the time to read and comment on my post! Plottr is interesting. I own a copy of it, and upgraded it to the current version as of somewhere earlier in the year uh..
Would be the best of both worlds, IMO. I can definitely understand how that could be problematic for everybody. It comes with several built-in structure templates and character templates, as well as allowing writers to design, save, and share their own.
The developers are active, deeply connected to their community, updating constantly, responsive to the requests of their users, and seem very committed to putting out a good product. I am NOT being paid by them — I just honestly love the program. One can only hope, George, one can only hope!
For both of those events… Thanks for taking the time to read and comment on my post. Current users obviously have a version of Scrivener they can utilise on Windows, and anyone that purchased licensing on or after 20th November will still be receiving a free upgrade to Scrivener 3 for Windows on launch.
I wrote an older novel on Scrivener 1. Wow, congrats on your word count! Get with it already. Thanks for reading and commenting, and happy writing! I am late to the party here but I use yWriter for most of my writing. It is free, works on windows, the developer uses it himself, and keeps it up to date. Also, it has an Android app, however, some aspects of it have been broken with recent changes Google has made and Simon the developer is trying to find a way to fix it. About the only feature I wish it had is the corkboard.
Originally I got it for the character name generator. And until I read here, I had no idea of the update mess it is going through or lack of updates I should say.
While both are free, it is a extra step. Of course it takes more time. It is all a matter of what you prefer. I had heard about v2 and until now, thought it had come out. But since it was a pay upgrade, I never paid attention.
I doubt it will ever be out at this point. Very sad as it is a good program. OStorybook is open source and has great potential, but its lack of import features except for cutting and pasting everything blocked my using it for much.
Both are wroth a look though if you want something that is on Windows. WriteWay is well done, reliable, and has a lot of nice features. The larger downside of WriterWay is the developer retired and no more updates will occur, but it runs well on Win 7, 8, and In the end I agree with everyone here, use what works well for YOU.
Everyone has a different process which are as varied as the stories we write. I completely agree about the mess. When I first published this post, I was terrified that Scrivener die-hards would descend upon it and rip me to shreds. Not surprising, but just goes to show the community is toxic. Different strokes for different folks, absolutely. Reading these comments from so many dedicated writers suggesting alternatives and describing their experience with them is refreshing and reassuring.
Thanks for taking the time to read and respond so thoroughly to this post. I appreciate it more than you know! Though even yWriter5beta is really yWriter8 under the hood. But it runs on Windows XP and everything forward I believe.
I have to admire him allowing so much backwards compatibly for those that need it. Not many developers will. Just unzip and run the. Like I said, it is a nice app and I really like it. Easy to work around them, but I just stayed with yWriter instead. Both have several youtube videos for them from various authors demonstrating how they use the apps. Some of the videos are a bit older, but most of the information is still relevant.
Thanks so much for taking the time to provide those links! Does anyone even use XP anymore? I am a subscriber to Microsoft It is a super great program suite. I am finding that OneNote can almost completely replace Scrivener at least in the way I use it. You can customize a list of tags and search for them throughout the Notebook, Section, or Page.
That way you can keep track of drafts, places that need editing, etc. You can dock a window while you research to take notes, or open two windows side by side to see research while writing. Admittedly, it still is not Scrivener. I used Scrivener for the organization. The three main features I want to see from Scrivener in OneNote are Snapshots so I can manually save page drafts, right now page versions take automatic snapshots in OneNote , Metadata for Pages so I can hover my mouse over pages to see descriptions , and Scrivenings so I can view my text running together.
Hi Dan, thanks for taking the time to read and comment on this post. I appreciate you sharing insights on your process and suggestions for improvements — I actually used OneNote for organizing practically everything for about 5 years before moving over to Notion.
Metadata would be a great feature for OneNote. I do think that Microsoft could invest more time into improving the program. Recommend Zotero as an alternative to OneNote with many more capabilities.
Free, academic respectable, flexible and powerful. A beautiful program with auto-online sync, groups, and more. Amount of online storage is only limit for free version.
We use the paid unlimited storage and attach all work there for local and online storage. Information organization as Scrivener tries to do. Struggled for 5 years with Scrivener, its unpredictable file structure, glitches and gave up when the disappearing cursor bug in the latest Windows Scrivener 3 Beta turned out to be from in Scrivener 1 there is no Scrivener 2 for Windows.
Google also mixed a Photo collection with another user with a similar email address. The history of great software they have purchased and abandoned like Picasa, Sketchup, Groups, etc. Real world typesetting is always InDesign. And all things must be PDF. From there we can output anywhere. It was blurry, even after tweaking the Windows settings and disable scaling. I do most of the outlining and brainstorming on paper now and my additional notes are done with a simple text editor Geany and Code Writer.
When you use a traditional tool such as Word for writing, you usually have to keep the research separate from the main document. Your research will be included in a binder, making it easy to access. The Corkboard view is especially useful for research. You can use this index card format to show you any type of material, from scientific formulae to the names of characters in your novel.
Another useful research tool is the Split Screen view. One way to use this is to have your document on one side of the screen and your research on the other. Once again, you can display the two screens either horizontally or vertically. Thus, while working on your manuscript you can bring up a relevant website or file on your computer that has the information you need.
The Compiler lets you combine parts of your manuscript that may be formatted differently such as the title page, preface, table of contents, and chapters of a book. One of the most efficient compiling tools is Collections. You create Collections using any criteria you want. This allows you to reorder material in your manuscript by dropping and dragging folders into a new Collection.
You create a Collection out of this material and compile it the way you want. The Corkboard is an outlining tool that performs a similar function as a standard cork or bulletin board. Corkboard view lets you see all of your documents as note or index cards. This is a powerful visual tool that gives you a broad perspective on your document and may suggest changes you want to make such as adding, deleting, or rearranging sections.
For example, you may have two notecards, each representing a chapter in your book. You may decide that you need another chapter in between to clarify the story. You can then add another notecard to your Corkboard. This feature is also good for helping you decide where to put different sections or chapters.
Looking at notecards, you might decide to reverse the order of two sections for clarity. The Corkboard is a visual tool, so it helps that you can customize it. You can adjust the size and appearance of notecards to your preference. As valuable as Scrivener is, every software has its drawbacks. Some of these, of course, are subjective and your own experience will depend on your needs and preferences. Scrivener 3 is currently available for Mac OS.
As of this writing, the Windows version of this update is not yet ready but it should be released any day as it was promised in early Considering everything that you can do with this software and comparing it to the competition, Scrivener provides solid value. Some writers why they need a product like Scrivener when they can edit with Word or Open Office and perhaps use an additional tool such as Grammarly for spelling and grammar. Scrivener helps you with every stage of the writing process including research, editing, organization, formatting, and exporting.
In fact, there are even courses dedicated to making Scrivener easier to use. Fortunately, the program is getting more user-friendly with each update. Scrivener is the kind of tool that becomes more valuable the more you use it.
At first, the time it takes to figure everything out negates some of the efficiency. The main caveat for using Scrivener is that you do have to put in the effort to learn it.
0コメント